One of my favorite quotes, by Theodore Roosevelt:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.” - Theodore Roosevelt in 1910 at the Sorbonne in Paris

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Is there a problem with democracy?

I read an article yesterday about how the youth in so many countries are disillusioned with democracy now. Basically, they feel that the politicians are corrupt and work for the banks and other corporations, rather than the people who vote them into office. I admit, I've been feeling this way myself for quite a while now. Some of the remarks being made in the article mention how even in countries that had dictators, they are no longer happy with the democratic method. Their parents say they are happy to be able to vote, but the youth see past this to the new issues that exist.

There is a tone in the article that suggest trying to come up with another option to democracy all together. "Increasingly, citizens of all ages, but particularly the young, are rejecting conventional structures like parties and trade unions in favor of a less hierarchical, more participatory system modeled in many ways on the culture of the Web."

I love this creative thinking and can hardly wait to see what comes out of it. Unfortunately, I feel that America may become the last dinosaur of democracy. I say unfortunately, because I foresee things having to get a lot worse, before enough Americans are willing to make the radical changes necessary. We could of course, try things like opening up our democracy to more than just the two party system we have now. But I just don't see it happening soon enough. But maybe we need to hit bottom, so that we are willing to make real changes in the long run, and not just settle for half way measures that are still susceptible to corruption.

Does this matter?

Saturday, September 24, 2011

The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act

I recently got an email from PCRM (Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine) about this new bit of legislature called PAMTA (The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act, H.R. 965/S. 1211). Basically, it's about having the FDA re-evaluate using antibiotics on livestock. The simplified version of the problem is livestock producers place animals in overcrowded, unsanitary living conditions to maximize their output and profits. Then, to prevent the inevitable spread of disease from such conditions and to spur faster growth in the animals, they routinely add antibiotics to their feed. Widespread use of antibiotics gives rise to resistant bacteria. Through contact with farm workers and contaminated waste runoff, resistant bacteria can spread to humans and other animals.

I have to say, that even if I didn't believe there was an issue with resistant strains of bacteria, I would have to support this kind of legislation to help change what is going on in factory farms. Hopefully, people who don't care about the conditions the animals are in will still have more selfish reasons to consider a change.

Is this important?

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Wall Street Protest

So, I just read an article about the protestors on Wall Street, and then read some of the remarks. There seemed to be a huge disconnect. I'll start with the remarks, which seemed to focus primarily on the idea that the protestors were against the rich, and that they believed that everyone on Wall Street is rich. That's not what I get out of reading about the protestors. From what I can gather, and this may be because it's more like how I feel, the protestors are fed up with things like bailouts, and corporate loopholes that allow them to corrupt our democracy, and damage the environment. They're fed up with the people who are causing the problems not only getting away with it, but getting rescued by our tax dollars. Many of them getting rewarded for doing a good job through bonuses, after we had to bail them out.

As the people in the remarks said, the average worker on Wall Street, isn't rich, and worked hard to get where they are. But Wall Street itself, unfortunately, is a symbol of many of the problems with our government and politics. All of our democrats and republicans are owned by big business, with the exception of a very few. (That's why I support the Green Party. But I do feel that Ron Paul is an exception and our best choice, and chance for a good president.) So I feel the protestors got it right. They picked probably the best symbol for what they think is wrong with this country, and it's unfortunate that many can't even slightly understand what it is they are protesting. Makes me wonder if they even looked into it before they made their remarks. And, it made them look ignorant, in my opinion.

Is this important, or just extremist being extreme?

Monday, September 19, 2011

Attitude

As some of my friends and family know, I've been in management, had my own business and been my own boss, and now work as a cashier at a local grocery chain. At first, I was embarrassed and felt that this job was beneath me. I thought I would move up quickly, especially after I started getting a lot of positive feedback from my supervisors and customers. But that didn't happen. This began to effect my attitude, which is usually very positive. I am a spiritual person though, and so I rediscovered prayer and asked for guidance. The result is that I learned that my attitude should not be brought down by my situation, but that I should use my attitude to bring me up. I've believed this for years, but now it is really being tested. Now I feel that I am where I am meant to be, at least, at this time of my life. Everyday, I have customers tell me how they see me smiling all the time, even when dealing with difficulties. And that I make their day.

Many people ask at some point in their life how they can make a difference. I think the answer can be as simple as having a positive attitude, and sharing a sincere smile with people around you. With the state of our economy right now, it may be the only thing some of us can to do help. In fact, I am beginning to believe, it is a big part of what we need to learn to get through this crisis. Economist, politicians, and big business want us to believe that the solution is more spending. Even the media is telling us this. Well, that never rang true with me, and less so now. I think the proof is in the pudding, and if you look at history, it has been proven time and time again. I won't assume that I know the answer, although I do have some ideas. But I believe, regardless of what the solution is, we need to remember that attitude is something we can control and can make a difference. I once heard that life is ten percent objective, and ninety percent attitude. In other words, you can't always control what is happening around you, but you can control how you decide to handle it.

Does this matter?

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

9/11

With the tenth anniversary coming up on Sunday we are hearing a lot of opinions about 9/11 again. I heard one today on the news that we have rebuilt New York and shown the terrorist that they did not win. It's a nice thought, but I'm not sure it's true at all. If we think about what their objective might have been, do we really think they just wanted to piss us off by killing a few thousand of our citizen in a single attack. That doesn't make any sense. From research I did back then, bin Laden's intention was to draw us into a war, and to expend our resources and bring about our own down fall. By my humble estimations of what is going on in this country, the terrorist may be close to succeeding. Albeit, we were on the downfall long before 9/11, but what we have done since then to pay the terrorist back and get revenge, has only helped to speed us towards the cliff. The only thing that makes this even worse, is how rich some people got because of it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against wealth, just against getting wealthy at the expense of others, especially others lives.

Maybe we should pretend we are winning though. What do you think? Does this matter?

Monday, September 5, 2011

Being vegetarian

When people find out that I'm vegetarian, they always ask why. They seem to think that I can give a simple ten second answer, and I'm pretty sure they expect to not agree. But more and more often, I'm finding that people are more receptive to the idea. They may not think that they can do it, but they still seem to agree that it would be healthier. So, I want to take a little time and explain some of my reasons on my blog.

First of all, I don't limit myself to any one reason, or just a few of them. There are a lot of reasons, and all of them work for me. I figure, with so many reasons, it's obvious that being vegetarian is the right way to go. The toughest part in starting this list is deciding where to start and what to include. Since most people seem to respond to the idea of the personal health reasons, let's start there. When it started for me, back in 1993, I was in college (I started late) and most of my information came from word of mouth. The first, and by far best source of information I came across that included facts based on research, was "Diet for a New America", by John Robbins, which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. He's the son of Robbins, from Baskin Robbins Ice Cream. Who better to talk about such a topic, right? Well, it turns out he knows quite a bit. His book is a wealth of knowledge. For example, one of the first questions people ask is, "where to you get your protein." The answer is, from pretty much everything. Anything that has ever lived, needs protein to survive and grow, even plants. To support this answer, I would like to impose on your sense of logic. Look at the largest land animals on this planet, elephants, hippos, cows, and many more. They are all pretty much herbivores (vegetarians), and nobody wonders where their protein comes from. And, in the typical American diet, about twice the recommended, or required amount of protein is consumed. So, no real problem there, you just need to eat a good variety of foods to make sure you get all of your nutrients.

Something else I learned from the book, although is was only a theory at the time and has since been proven, is that even though American's consume more dairy than any other culture we still have the highest incidents of osteoporosis. Does that make sense, after all the marketing from the dairy industry to tell you how good milk is for us, especially against osteoporosis? The reason, is because our bodies utilize calcium in processing animals proteins, so most of it never makes it to our bones.

I'll move on to another aspect of being vegetarian now. The environmental impact of eating meat. To raise livestock for meat, we utilize literally tons of resources, like water, corn and soy. If we took the soy and corn that we use to feed livestock and gave it to humans, we wouldn't have people starving in the world. Eighty to ninety percent of both crops go towards feeding livestock. And we get such a small return on that investment, about ten to one. Meaning it takes ten pounds of these crops to get a pound of meat. And the type of farms that these animals are raised on are destroying the environment around them. Thousands of animals crammed together eating a food they weren't designed for (corn). That's right, cows bodies become acidic and sick from all of the corn they are fed, because they are meant to eat grass. But they don't grow fast enough from grass, and they aren't fat enough then either. (Another reason eating meat is not healthy) And all of these animals create a lot of manure, which ends up contaminating a lot of ground water systems and could be causing birth defects in the local communities.

In countries in South America, rain forest are being destroyed to create more farm land for raising beef and livestock. This land isn't very fertile, because the fertility of a rain forest is mostly in the plants and animals, not the ground it's on. So once it's wiped out, it's gone for good.

Moving right along, I hope I haven't bored you yet. Let's get to what is probably the least important factor for most, the treatment of the animals. Animal husbandry used to be more about caring for the animals, and letting them feed on the local grass until they naturally reached maturity and were ready for slaughter. If this were the way things were still done, I could be more accepting. It wouldn't bother me so much if someone chose to still eat meat. But this is far from how things are done now a days. In most cases the animals are not allowed to roam, in fact, most are prevented from moving much at all. They are given diets that are not natural to them, and cause their bodies to become toxic. To counter this we give them tons of antibiotics just to keep them alive until they are ready to slaughter. By that time, most of them are close to death anyway.

I could go on for quite a while, but the fact is, anybody who has read this far is probably already interested, and I'm preaching to the choir. All others probably didn't get past the title. If you are interested, and want a quite easy way to get your feet wet on this information, Diet for a New American also comes in a video format that you can watch on YouTube.

I hope you think this matters.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Child protective services?

I have a niece that lives with her father (my sister died when she was young) who is constantly drunk and broke. They live in a trailer on some land about twenty minutes outside of town. He has a criminal record for drunk driving, doesn't pay his property taxes, gambles what little money he makes, neglects his daughter, lets the utilities get turned off, etc, etc. My niece even told her teachers at school about it, and they called child protective services, which have been contacted numerous times already about the situation. They sent him a subpena to appear in court twice, he no-showed both times, so the case is dropped, because  they can't be sure he got the notices, because he doesn't answer the door when they deliver them. It's starting to sound like child protective service is another oxymoron.

I know there are horror stories about what happens to kids that are taken from their parents too, and where they could end up, especially since she is about to turn fourteen. But she has family that is more than willing to take her, if allowed to. In fact, my father spent tens of thousands trying to get custody of her just before my sister died, but no one wanted to support him at the time, so he lost.


Anyway, does this matter?